Archive | interconnectedness RSS feed for this section

We cannot be separate from anything, everything is everything, the one is the all, a great oneness.

25 Jan
  • By Paul Moses
  • By Paul O’Hara Copyright © UniMed Living Pty Ltd

We gaze outwardly to the stars and inwardly to the atom, still seeking to measure it all in three-dimensions, which is in direct contrast to what we know the nature of the multi-dimensional Universe to be. This desire to measure and see everything in terms of our three-dimensional world allows a sleight of hand that reduces or collapses, or squashes, what is unified vibration or waves into what it is not – i.e., a particle that behaves as an individual solid, separate from the vast interconnectedness of vibration. And these particles are the building blocks of what we call matter, which we have observed to be separate from each other.

This is not true of course, but simply an illusion, as we know atoms are 99.99…% space, and space is filled with vibration. Even if it has become densified it is still just vibration and still very much connected to all other vibration, whether we like it or not.

We have this perception or need to unify, to come together, however in truth we are already all unified as one, and in this oneness we cannot help but be connected to everything else – such are the mechanics of vibration in space, our universe. Connecting to our oneness comes from a surrender to our multi-dimensional state, as it has been there all along. Whenever we try to unify ourselves, or anything in life, we are actually coming from a point of separateness, and we only ever achieve separateness from this.

In our desire to make sense of the world we seek to create and recreate everything to fit into the image of the material world that we uphold to be. We create the illusion that the world is made up of particles, and we use this to reinforce the notion of the individual. Therefore, it can be said quite clearly that there is no such thing as the individual, and therefore there is no such thing as the ‘I think’. By identifying purely as physical beings, have we disconnected from that which we truly are?

If we are only open to the physical reality with our separate identities, our gaze comes from that individuality and seeks separateness.

Quantum Mechanics simply describes the truth of our Universe.

If we say that it is only describing the atomic-world, are we denying the fact that all our chemistry is bound by the laws of quantum mechanics? This includes all biology, our bodies, the planet and all the stars. QM is not merely a theory, it is the basis of every aspect of life right down to the most practical, it is in fact a very practical science. Without these laws of quantum-physics we would not have mobile phones, GPS, laser, LED screens, MRI scanners, all our computer technology and communication media.

How did our modern-day science become separated into a myriad of very separate parts, often ignoring each other and the truths presented by one another? Quantum Mechanics naturally is central to all of science for it offers absolute truth to how all matter and energy in all sciences relate and interact. Yet the vast majority within the so-called ‘science’ field know very little of Quantum Mechanics. The very foundation of modern ‘evidence-based-science’ is flawed when a basic understanding of Quantum Mechanics is applied, for the ‘evidence’ is always affected by the observer.

We are actually living as a reduced or collapsed version of what we are, gazing with eyes that are blinkered from the truth: we are not individuals as such but rather inextricably connected to everyone and everything – just as every particle in the universe is connected to every other particle.

If we choose to see and recognise individuality we are creating and recreating that illusion, a corruption of the truth, simply a lie. The truth is that our Universe, as the name implies, is one song, or one unified vibration where nothing happens by itself. There is no such thing as individualisation – we cannot be separate from anything, everything is everything, the one is the all, a great oneness.

Our responsibility as scientists, as we all are, is to open our being to our world of space, a space filled with vibration constantly communicating with itself. And to know: I am that I am.

 Irreducible: Consciousness, Life, Computers, and Human Nature. Federico Faggin: 2024 John Hunt Publishing

23 Jan

COMPUTERS AND HUMAN NATURE

On Human Nature vs. Machines: “Man is not a machine; he is a spiritual being, expressing a depth of consciousness and emotion that transcends mere mechanical function.”

On the Danger of Misconception: “The idea that classical computers can become smarter than human beings is a dangerous fantasy. It is dangerous because if we accept this notion, we will inherently limit ourselves to expressing only a very small fraction of who we are, reducing the rich tapestry of human experience to mere computations.”

On Consciousness and Quantum Systems: “We are not even close to computers in terms of understanding the complexities of consciousness. While comparisons are often drawn, the reality is that the brain functions on an entirely different level. We are quantum systems, embodying a depth and intricacy that far surpasses that of artificial constructs.

On Free Will: “Humanity stands at a significant crossroads. Either it chooses to return to the belief that it holds a fundamentally different nature than machines, or it risks being reduced to a mere machine among machines, losing the essence of what it means to be human.”

On Meaning and Understanding: “A computer ‘knows without knowing that it knows,’ highlighting a crucial distinction. It processes symbols without genuine understanding; there is no witness, no pause for reflection, and no self that engages in true comprehension of its actions or outputs.”

On the Limitations of AI: “AI cannot truly be empathic. The notion of ’empathic robots’ being developed to care for the elderly is overly simplistic and naive. Such claims fail to recognize the profound human capacity for empathy, which cannot be replicated through programmed responses or algorithms.”

 

The Awakening – Federico Faggin

20 Jan

IRREDUCIBLE- 2024 John Hunt Publishing

Top physicist and inventor of the microprocessor & touch screen, Federico Faggin, for an intriguing conversation into the nature of reality. Federico once had a materialistic scientific perspective on consciousness and reality until one day a spontaneous spiritual awakening changed his perspective forever. In this episode he shares that very experience and how it has shaped his current view on reality. With this deeper knowing, he spent decades researching reality, today he shares his findings. He reveals why computers can never be conscious, who we are our essence, what carries on after death, and our unbreakable connection to something larger than ourselves. He also discusses the very real force of love that underlies all things, the secret to spiritual growth, and why humans can never be replaced by artificial intelligence.

Love is the feeling out of which all other feelings emerge.

It’s the force that motivates you to find out who you are.

– Federico Faggin

The Hard Problem of Consciousness

David Chalmers formulated the “hard problem” of consciousness as the question of how and why neural activity in the brain gives rise to subjective experiences (qualia). Traditional science considers consciousness an emergent property of brain complexity, but Faggin offers a radically different perspective:

  1. Consciousness is fundamental and primary: it is not a byproduct of the brain but exists independently of matter.
  2. The material world is an expression of consciousness: rather than consciousness emerging from matter, matter itself is shaped by consciousness.
  3. The Self is irreducible and unified: each individual is a unique manifestation of a universal consciousness.
  4. Information alone cannot explain consciousness: unlike computers and AI, which process information but lack subjectivity and intentionality, consciousness involves direct experience.

Faggin proposes a reinterpretation of quantum mechanics based on the primacy of consciousness. He builds upon key quantum phenomena that challenge materialist views and integrates them into his metaphysical framework.

Federico Faggin’s Quantum Metaphysics

One of the most enigmatic and debated aspects of quantum mechanics is the collapse of the wavefunction. In the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, physical systems exist in a superposition of multiple states until they are observed. This raises the profound question: what causes the collapse of possibilities into a single reality? 

Federico Faggin’s metaphysical interpretation suggests that consciousness itself plays an active role in this process. Rather than being a passive observer of an already-determined reality, consciousness participates in shaping what is actualized. In this view, observation is not merely an act of measurement but an act of creation, where consciousness determines the outcome of quantum potentialities. 

This perspective aligns with interpretations of quantum mechanics that emphasize the role of the observer, such as the von Neumann–Wigner interpretation, but extends further by positing consciousness as the foundational element of reality rather than an emergent property of the brain.

This framework naturally leads to the idea that the universe is fundamentally interconnected, a notion strongly supported by the phenomenon of quantum entanglement. When two particles become entangled, their states remain correlated regardless of the distance between them, even across vast cosmic scales. The speed at which this correlation manifests exceeds the limits of classical physics, defying the constraints of locality. 

If consciousness is indeed fundamental, then this interconnectedness might not be merely a physical anomaly but a reflection of a deeper unity within reality itself. The separation between objects, beings, and events could perhaps appears from our limited perception, while at the most fundamental level, all things are interwoven within a single, complex and conscious reality. This evokes the concept of Wholeness which is central to our research in the Science & Philosophy Institute.

However, contrasting with our approach, Faggin suggest that matter itself is not independent of consciousness but rather a manifestation of it. Classical physics treats matter as the fundamental substrate of reality, governed by deterministic laws. However, quantum mechanics reveals a world in which particles do not have fixed properties until they are measured, existing instead as a field of probabilities. 

Faggin argues that these probabilities are not mere abstract mathematical constructs but expressions of consciousness interacting with the physical world. In this sense, what we perceive as “matter” is not an independent entity but rather the structured unfolding of consciousness into form. As such, the laws of physics do not emerge from an abstract mathematical framework but from an intrinsic intelligence embedded within reality itself.

This leads to a redefinition of information at the quantum level. In classical computation and physics, information is treated as a purely quantitative measure, devoid of intrinsic meaning. However, if consciousness is primary, then quantum information is not just numerical data—it is qualitative and experiential. 

What Faggin proposes is not merely an extension of quantum theory but a profound rethinking of reality itself, where consciousness and matter are inseparably intertwined, and the universe is understood as a living, conscious whole.

A new Model of Reality: Internal and External Reality

Faggin introduces a dual model of reality, which he calls “Internal Reality” and “External Reality”:

  • External Reality (Material World): the world described by classical and quantum physics, governed by objective laws but devoid of subjectivity.
  • Internal Reality (Consciousness): the domain of subjective experience, intuition, and creativity.

According to Faggin, consciousness is not a byproduct of the brain but the fundamental essence from which the material universe emerges. Internal Reality shapes and informs External Reality.

If consciousness is fundamental and the universe is its manifestation, several profound implications arise:

  • Science must integrate subjectivity: the purely objective study of reality is insufficient and a new paradigm is needed that acknowledges the active role of consciousness.
  • Computers will never achieve consciousness: while AI can simulate intelligence, it will never possess true awareness, or a subjective experience deeply interconnected to its larger context.
  • Quantum mechanics must be reinterpreted: the observer’s role is not just epistemological (as in the Copenhagen interpretation) but ontological.
  • Life has an inherent purpose: if consciousness is primary, then the universe is not random or mechanical but follows an evolution guided by conscious purpose.

Federico Faggin’s theory offers a revolutionary perspective on consciousness and reality, proposing that consciousness is the fundamental essence of existence, while matter is merely one of its expressions. His theory provides a possible answer to the hard problem of consciousness and suggests a new interpretative framework for quantum mechanics, moving beyond reductionist materialism toward a metaphysical vision where each individual is a unique manifestation of the universal primeval consciousness.

Universal Consciousness Field

19 Jan

Proposed Framework

The Universal consciousness field exists beyond space-time in an undifferentiated state. Through differentiation, it gives rise to localized excitations, which manifest as physical structures or individual consciousness. Following the Big Bang, the universal consciousness field evolves, generating complex systems capable of awareness – sentient beings with individual consciousness localized in space-time. Once differentiated, personal thought shapes individual awareness and perception, producing evolving subjective interpretations of reality over time. This process creates the illusion of separateness, even though all individual consciousness remains intrinsically connected within the universal consciousness field.

Personal thought reinforces the sense of individuality while simultaneously concealing the underlying unity with universal consciousness. An important implication of modeling as a localized excitation of interconnected nature of the field is that dissolution of individuality (e.g., through death) does not imply annihilation but rather reintegration into the universal field. This aligns with perspectives that treat consciousness as a temporary manifestation of a universal substrate.

Maria Stromme, Professor Uppsala University: Consciousness as the foundation – new theory

The Term Ecology

24 Dec

The term Ecology, as used locally, does not have the connotation of the “environment” as used in America, There is no separation of man and his environment; rather there is a fusion of man and his environment. Ecology represents the study of the ecological entity as a whole. When a given ecological complex appears unfavorable from the standpoint of man, for example, he does not have a prior claim to adjustment on the part of the other elemen (ts of the complex. The others have just as much “right” to demand modification of his behavior as he has on theirs. All are one in Nature. The appreciation of this Oneness and the delicate interrelationships of its diffusions represents the prime academic purpose of the Ecology Series. (The Land of Keikitran and Eleevan) R.G.H. Siu

Albert Schweitzer himself:

15 Dec

Albert Schweitzer himself:

Ethics are complete, profound, and alive only when addressed to all living beings. Only then we are in spiritual connection with the world … Profound love demands a deep conception and out of this develops reverence for the mystery of life. It brings us close to all beings. To the poorest and smallest, as well as all others. We reject the idea that man is ‘master of other creatures,’ ‘lord’ above all others. We bow to reality. We recognize that all existence is a mystery, like our own existence. The poor fly which we would like to kill with our hand has come into existence like ourselves. It knows anxiety, it knows hope for happiness, it knows fear of not existing any more. Has any man so far been able to create a fly? That is why our neighbor is not only man: my neighbor is a creature like myself, subject to the same joys, the same fears, and the idea of reverence for life gives us something more profound and mightier than the idea of humanism. It includes all living beings” (Quoted in The Schweitzer Album, edited by Erica Anderson, 1965, p. 174).

Image

Creation Never Stops…

25 Nov
Image

Cosmic Roots

26 Oct

Artificial and Negative Stimuli

25 Oct

The majority of individuals remain unaware that an alternative mode of living exists. They fail to recognize that contemporary society has compelled us to make a detrimental choice: by embracing an artificial environment, we ultimately diminish our capacity to connect with the vital energy of life. Many do not perceive this as a loss, as they are unfamiliar with this innate ability or the boundless potential and exceptional well-being it can provide. Regrettably, artificial stimuli now surpass natural positive signals. For example, a restful night’s sleep offers us positive natural stimuli that nurture our life energy. Similarly, for example, contact with the Earth, exposure to sunlight, consumption of natural foods, and the internal sensations of the body all convey positive signals that help sustain the connection with life energy. Unfortunately, these positive signals are increasingly overwhelmed by artificial and negative stimuli, resulting in a diminished natural sensation and disconnection from energy.

Master Waysun Liao

A New World View Is Necessary for Sustainability

2 Oct

by Rodger R Ricketts

When humanity moves past the anthropocentric viewpoint (the idea that “humans are the center of the universe”) existence on Earth will flourish. According to that naive perspective, the value of other living and non-living components of existence is solely determined by how they affect or benefit humans. By learning to value the diversity and interdependence of all life, this oversimplified viewpoint is replaced by a wise spiritual non-dualistic relationship. Humanity can then secure the foundation for a long-term existence in conditions conducive and beneficial to human habitation.

When we attempt to explore the nature of life, we must rise above our ignorant deep-rooted beliefs. The historically dominant way of conceiving life, namely, anthropocentrism is based on ill-founded preconceptions and lead to a range of negative consequences, such as: Environmental destruction and species extinction and human alienation from nature and loss of human well-being.

Such an anthropocentric relationship with nature has predominated since the beginning of the modern era. The dominant worldview of modern thinking is characterized by an objectification of nature, which, by discerning its laws, has made possible the mastery over nature and provision of goods which was previously inconceivable and unparalleled. While mechanistic explanation is an important part of understanding life, it is a just part of the whole story.

The all-consuming self dominates society today in the United States and other modern nations. It has been developed by conscious efforts of businessmen and politicians. For example, in the 1920’s, Wall Street banker Paul Mazura, who invented the public relations profession, said there must be a shift in America from a need to a desires culture. That people must be conditioned to desire to want and buy new things even before the old have entirely been consumed. Human’s desires must overshadow it’s needs. Consumerism is a socio-cultural and economic phenomenon that is typical of industrialized societies. It is characterized by the continuous making and acquisition of goods.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently advanced at a rapid pace, and while there are useful and appropriate applications of AI, modern culture has overlooked our tacit, embodied, living intelligence or wisdom of how we should live in favor of overemphasizing algorithms and other mathematical abstractions. As a result, our ability to understand the world has significantly decreased.

Many people in today’s consumerism-driven society develop an ego or consumer self and lead inauthentic lives. Consumers continue to live their lives under the whims of corporations. Furthermore, rather than learning about the spiritual traditions of cultures, the world’s future generations will be exposed to a materialistic dualistic curriculum, which will make them nihilistic (thinking that life has no purpose and rejecting all moral and spiritual values as well as in political and social institutions).

In the Western World, people often focus on their ego instead of being their true selves. But studies in psychology and spiritual teachings show that being overly focused on the ego is a false belief. Our true selves connect us to nature, but this connection gets hidden by illusions of identity, making us confused about who we really are. This confusion can take away our inspiration and sense of connection, which leads to a lack of original thoughts and happiness. Instead, we end up living in a way that is influenced by companies. Future generations will become even more focused on material things and lose touch with the spiritual traditions of their cultures. As author David Korten says, “We can thrive by pursuing life, or we can fail by chasing money. The choice is ours.”

To be happy and embodied we must learn to let go of our illusion of ourselves. In the end, all the massive efforts invested into social manipulation of humanity can be rejected. All of us, from the spiritual worldview, can discover that we are identical with our cosmic roots and of nature. Humanity is living in a living universe. When we understand that our life instinct is the uplifting creative principle of the universe and become conscious to make our worldview complete and balance, the course of our life can change abandoning alienation. Life organizes itself in systems, in networks, and these living networks are inherently regenerative, creative and intelligent. We have the potential of human creativity that reaches the natural level of happiness by adopting a worldview that emphasizes how to live a happy, meaningful and fulfilling life with the importance of family, human relations, nature and respecting all life. The trajectory of our lives can shift away from alienation when we realize that our life instinct is the universe’s uplifting creative principle and become conscious to make our worldview complete and balanced.

With the non-dualistic view our decision-making ability comes in line with the principle of the life principle that urges us to continuously maintain the fullest physical, psychological, emotional, spiritual and rational quality of life. The Life principle is the rule for a profoundly happy and meaningful individual life. As members of the terrestrial community, it is in our nature to do our best for the betterment of life on all levels.

Life is essentially a vital activity, a ceaseless action for fulfilling life’s norms given by the principle of life. The most fundamental fact of our everyday life, mental causality, the ability to act of our own volition and to direct our thinking and acting purposefully, is forced to be denied by the consistent physical view. It binds us in our deepest identity with each other and with Nature. The full appreciation of our deepest, Nature- given identity, that is, of our living nature implies a full appreciation of all forms of life. The principle of life has a cosmic scope. It offers a cosmic principle to guide human behavior. It allows a new, exact scientific understanding of the life instinct. By virtue of our deepest identity, we, as all living beings, tend to act in accordance with the life instinct; however, there can be and there are exceptions, especially in the world of man alienated from himself and from Nature. This alienation is closely linked to the greatest problem of our time, long-term unsustainability (Grandpierre 2022b).

In this respect, the cosmic life instinct can be seen as the source of our natural inclination to live up to our deepest selves and act for the well-being of our individual, communal and social life. A healthy, fulfilling and well-grounded way of life requires a deep understanding of the life principle, its cosmic context and depth, shifting our worldview from a matter-centered to a life-centered approach. Regenerating and preserving the health, well-being and integrity of the natural environment requires acting in accordance with its working principle: the life principle. The most decisive step of sustainability lies in the ranking of our fundamental values according to the primary value of life meant in its individual, communal, social and ecological context. What we really want is not extremely high material wealth but a life rich in fulfilling emotional, intellectual and physical activities. Our deepest identity is rooted in the life principle and our decision-making realizing it. A prerequisite for sustainability is to learn to respect life in its individual, communal, social and cosmic context in a balanced manner. Cosmic life is one; planetary, social, communal, family, individual and cellular life should be harmonious.

In the quest for the ideal of ‘Life for All in Fullness’, it is crucial that technical viability and economic feasibility are not the sole factors in the progress of science. The emphasis should also be placed on improving the living conditions for both people and all life forms, thus preserving the ‘integrity’ of the life principle. On a spiritual level, humans possess a deep connection with all other beings, being ’embedded’ within the fabric of creation, which demands that they honor their fellow creatures. Humans have the ability to recognize and appreciate the inherent will to live that exists in every life form, including plants.

The principle of ‘Life for All in Fullness’, is essential so that technical feasibility and economic practicality are not the only considerations in scientific advancement. Instead, the focus must also encompass the enhancement of living conditions for both humanity and all forms of life, thereby safeguarding the ‘integrity’ of the life principle. Davies concludes that the question “what is life?” will finally be answered by “a fundamentally new kind of organizing principle” Spiritually, humans share a profound connection with all other creatures, being ’embedded’ within creation which necessitates that they respect their fellow beings. Humans can recognize and value the independent will to live inherently found in every form of life, including plants.

This perspective necessitates a transformed understanding of the ecology of earth, leading to altered approaches and actions towards it. The concept of auto telicity, characterized by reverence or respect, applies not only to humans but to all living entities, recognizing the intrinsic value of animals, plants, and even inanimate nature. Therefore, fellow beings should not be regarded—as has often been the case in modern tradition—as mere objects; rather, they ought to be seen as subjects deserving of esteem and protection, with the aim of preserving biodiversity, since humans remain dependent on its ‘community’ with the other beings of nature.

A new understanding of the earth’s ecology is required by this viewpoint, which will result in different methods and behaviors toward it. All living things are subject to the idea of autotelicity, which is defined by the joy and meaning that comes from doing the activity itself, not from an external reward or outcome. It acknowledges the inherent worth of plants, animals, and even inanimate objects. In order to preserve biodiversity, fellow beings should not be viewed as mere objects, as has frequently been the case in modern tradition. Instead, they should be viewed as subjects worthy of respect and protection, as humans continue to rely on their “community” with other natural beings.

Humanity can only fully benefit from material advancements and effectively manage the associated risks if it undergoes a profound transformation in values, mindset, and practices. Merely engaging in ecological initiatives is insufficient; genuine sustainability requires a fundamental shift in our hearts and minds. The prevailing view that nature exists solely for human exploitation and technological control is a core principle driving current industrial progress, which is accelerating at an alarming rate. The challenge lies not just in individual moral failings like greed, but in the broader systemic pressures of modern economies that prioritize capital growth and often pursue limitless expansion.

Most people are pushed in a materialistic way of life and have a worldview which creates a sense of alienation. Our image of ourselves is based on our image of humankind which is based largely on our worldview, therefore, we need to build a worldview on a solid, correct foundation. Nowadays we live in a situation in which we have to change the foundation of our view of reality we have to admit that this is not an everyday situation but one that requires the unusual effort to attain. Now we all have a seemingly solid understanding of reality and it seems all the more solid because most people have the same conviction and it is also reinforced by the dominant physical, materialistic worldview. Moreover, the dominant materialistic view is deeply rooted- centuries old. However, humankind is based on living fundamentally in nature, the nature given by the life instinct that sets the goals, while nature provides the means to achieve them, thus providing a sound basis for a healthy culture.

The fundamental constitutes of nature – life is first and foremost a ceaseless action but also a myriad of possibilities for action that allows it to elevate itself by unfolding and fulfilling its highest potential. Modern society has been unable to take into account this part of reality without which life would not exist and would not be possible -namely the instinct for life. It is therefore immensely important that it becomes understood both scientifically and philosophically that life is more than only about survival. Instead, the life principle tells us that life is to be directed towards a high quality of life. Life is primarily directed towards feeling ourselves well, high above the level of mere survival and this ensures the prospects to feel ourselves well or better. Our feelings are essential to our quality of life. We conceive our quality of life by our natural instinctive feelings. Above all life is about feeling good individually and more importantly in our relationship with our families, our social communities, and nature.

The life principle is the principle of beneficial feelings, the dignity of life is for every living being. As a natural given right to feel itself well, to feel good in the present and good or better in the future. To be respected fully to the greatest extent. This life principle that is the treasure of the universe, the source of all value is present within us. It is the treasure of our life and we are naturally inclined to pay attention, nourish and care for this cosmic treasure in all its manifestations. We are most fundamentally and most personally interwoven with each other and with other living beings through the life principle. That is why if we appreciate the life instincts, we will appreciate the same life instinct in all manifestations. This recognition is the basis and essence of an environmental philosophy that values living communities. In fact, without biological laws, life necessarily would become an appendage of matter. It would lose it’s dignity and intrinsic nature if we have to recognize the reality of the life principle.

Life has an autonomous reality having its own characteristics, following its own values, and its own possibilities are different than those of a materialistic society. For science, this is a fact that has its own independent principle – the life principle. This worldview assumes that cosmic life is eternal. The materialistic view cannot come into existence by itself only. Fundamental reality acts within us from the aspect of our self, defined as our decision making center. It is the life instinct. The life principle is both imminent and transcendent since we have an access to the life instinct internally and that is transcendent since it goes beyond the observable universe. The life instincts of living organisms and of the living universe are identical. The casual order of life, the first cause acts as the cosmic level. In this case an eternal energy, that we cannot name, is a first cause and time in a logical sense since the living universe is primal being itself. We can, in the logical sense, regard this as the First Division, that the world of reason is the first step. The realization of Anthropocene, the current geological age, is viewed as the period during which human activity became the dominant influence on climate and the environment and it is no longer possible – as in previous eras – to distinguish sharply between cultural and natural phenomena. Some geologists argue that the Anthropocene began with the Industrial Revolution.

To ensure a sustainable future, humanity must move beyond an anthropocentric, dualistic viewpoint and awaken to non-dualism with which one recognizes the intrinsic value of all forms of life. This shift, that reveals a respectful relationship with the Giai, is essential for securing a viable environment for future generations.

Physician and Nobel Prize winner Albert Schweitzer advocated the necessity of mindfully offering to every living being a reverence for life. This ethic makes no distinction between more valuable and less valuable, higher and lower life. Through the ethics of reverence for life we enter into a spiritual relation with this world. Good is understood as the means to preserve and promote life, raising life to develop to its highest value. Evil, then, means harming or destroying life, making it incapable of developing. This is a basic principle necessary for ethical thinking for any form of enhancement of specific life forms.