Today is the launch of my new book- The Garden of Eden in This Life. It is available in paperback, hardcover and kindle on Amazon. The following is the book description. With Metta, Rodger Ricketts.
What if the story of the Garden of Eden wasn’t just ancient myth, but a timeless guide to reclaiming our original wholeness? What if the “fall” from innocence was not the end, but an invitation to return—consciously—to a deeper unity with ourselves, each other, and the world?
In The Garden of Eden in This Life, Dr. Rodger R. Ricketts—a clinical psychologist, mindfulness teacher, and lifelong student of the Buddha’s teachings—unveils a profound perspective linking ancient wisdom, modern psychology, and the apophatic (negative) spiritual tradition. Drawing from over forty years of study and practice, he explores how non-dualistic teachings from Buddhism, science, and multiple faith traditions reveal the limits of language, the illusions of separation, and the path back to an integrated state of being.
You will journey through concepts like Sunyata (emptiness), the via negativa, and the psychology of transcendence—discovering how humanity’s separation from nature and spirit can be healed through direct experience, compassionate living, and expanded awareness.
This is more than a philosophical exploration—it’s a practical roadmap for living with clarity, joy, and interconnectedness. Through cross-cultural insights, reflective practices, and meditative approaches, Dr. Ricketts shows how embracing the ineffable mystery of life can dissolve division, foster ecological and social harmony, and restore our inner paradise.
Whether you are a seeker, a meditator, a student of comparative religion, or someone simply longing for a more meaningful existence, The Garden of Eden in This Life will inspire you to see beyond duality and step into a living experience of unity.
If you are ready to move beyond dogma, transcend the limits of language, and reawaken to the timeless ground of being—this book will guide you there. Open these pages and begin your journey back to the Garden… in this life.
Chapter 10- The Ineffability of Transcendence and Nothingness The God is No-Thing An Apophatic Assertion: An Introduction for Humankind’s Transpersonal Actualization– revised -. Copyright Rodger Ricketts Psy.D.,2023. All rights reserved. Protected by international copyright conventions. No part of this chapter may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever, or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, without express permission of the Authorpublisher, except in the case of brief quotations with due acknowledgement.
Chapter 10
We have heard the phrase “I just don’t know how to describe it” when we attempt to put into words what we have directly experienced. Apophatic theology wonders about the same thing, but on a different level, of how to speak about the transcendent reality as different from cataphatic theology, which describes “God” or the divine by using affirmations or positive statements. Mystics have often insisted that their experiences of transcendence or divinity are beyond the realm of language and concepts.“God is greater than anything that we can conceive,” as said by Saint Anselm.
Many thinkers throughout history have recognized this impossibility of positively describing the All, commonly called “God,” and instead affirm its ultimate mystery, incomprehensibility, and ineffability. For example, in the magazine Fiddlehead, author Tim Lilburn states, “The deepest truth in all things is numinous or mysterious, these Apophatic masters taught, beyond reason, beyond language.” In The Unknown God: Negative Theology in the Platonic Tradition: Plato to Eriugena (2015), the academic Deirdre Carabine wrote,
The Apophatic or negative way stresses God’s absolute transcendence and unknowability in such a way that we cannot say anything about the Divine essence because God is so totally beyond being. The dual concept of the immanence and transcendence of God can help us to understand the simultaneous truth of both ‘ways’ to God: at the same time, as God is immanent, God is also transcendent. At the same time, as God is knowable, God is also unknowable. God cannot be thought of as one or the other only.
In his book Language & Silence (1998), essayist, literary critic and teacher George Steiner writes,
In Buddhism […] the highest, purest reach of the contemplative act is that which has learned to leave language behind it. The ineffable lies beyond the frontiers of the word. It is only by breaking through the walls of language that visionary observance can enter the world of total and immediate understanding. Where such understanding is attained, the truth needs no longer suffer the impurities and fragmentation that speech necessarily entails.
The Dhamma or Truth (the teachings of the Buddha) is “profound, hard/difficult to see and to fathom, peaceful and sublime, unattainable by mere reasoning/not within the sphere of reasoning, subtle, to be experienced by the wise” (M.I.167). In the Buddha’s apophatic discourse, there are two levels of truth: conventional and transcendent. Language and theories are only valid at the conventional dualistic level, where they can make logically coherent assertions. However, at the ultimate non-dualistic level, language can only point to the truth that must be directly experienced and realized. The teacher, monk and philosopher Nāgārjuna suggests a total relinquishing of all views: “I prostrate to Gautama Buddha, Who through compassion, Taught the true doctrine, Which leads to the relinquishing of all views” (see Examinations of Views, MMK XXVII). In fact, the apophatic tradition warns of the relativity of concepts and against the reification of ideas and experiences.
Christianity has long struggled with the problem of creating a linguistic description of “God.” There is the easily recognized problem that, since language is based on worldly/human experiences and categories, it is, therefore, impossible to reflect a transcendent existence. In other words, since language is a finite and relativistic tool, it cannot describe an infinite and transcendent “existence.” As theologian Emmett Fox wrote, using Christian terms, “Material language is made to fit material needs, and it simply will not satisfactorily express true spiritual ideas.” For these, we need the new Tongue of which Jesus spoke. We seldom realize how much we really are in the grips of the dictionary. Fox emphasized that we have certain experiences, and then we have language, with its hard-and-fast boundaries, that says, “You shall not say that wonderful thing—you shall say only this—and we find on paper the pale, lifeless shadow of the thing that came to life in our soul.” While an experience is direct and knowable, our description of it is abstracted and conceptualized.
There is a wealth of apophatic examples in the Buddhist canon, for instance, in Saṃyutta 43. Nibbāna or Nirvāṇa (the highest spiritual state and the ultimate goal of Buddhism) is negatively qualified as unconditioned, uninclined, taintless, non-manifested, deathless, unelaborated. This shows the avoidance of categorically defining or describing a reality that is ultimately beyond linguistic description, as it is unconditioned, whereas language is always conditioned.
These apophatic traditions open easily to non-duality. The non-duality experience is the realization of unity after the cognitively constructed veil of duality is lifted. Besides the Christian examples, in Buddhism, sunyata—the experience of the void or nothingness—is taught as being beyond conceptions or categorical thought, and, like the Taoist Dao, it remains inexhaustible and ever-present.
When questioned about the nature of awakening, and since the experience is ineffable, the Buddha did not theorize or use conceptualization. The Buddha saw no truth in anything beyond contact or direct experience for, as is commonly taught in Buddhism, no theories, no conceptions, and no experience can go beyond contact and remaining meaningful. The Buddha teaches how to see “things as they are,” or better, “things as they have come to be thus” without substantial, ontological essences.
Saññā or Language as a Necessarily Biased Cognitive Tool
By understanding the nature of language and conceptualization, awakened individuals are trained through Bhavana or cultivation to a detachment from the intellect, allowing them to experience reality beyond the limitations of their thoughts and mental constructs. Especially by analyzing the thorough teachings of the Buddha, we can develop a fruitful discourse about the apophatic traditions’ insights into the limitations of language trying to describe the ineffable.
Knowing the relation of the Buddhist word saññā to language is crucial for the proper understanding of linguistics. Saññā is described as a label, perception, allusion, act of memory or recognition, interpretation, and language is meant to be a tool for our relative and efficient functioning in the world. Concepts belong to the field of language and to saññā. They have their own natural context in which they function well. Therefore, we can perceive and recognize the world in a way that reflects our past experiences.
Saññā works by grasping the main feature of an object while ignoring other less obvious features. It works by categorizing, labelling and finding similarities and differences. This allows the classification of objects in the same groups and for comparisons among them. This simplifies our experience in a necessary way. Otherwise, we would become overburdened with an excess of information and survive poorly if at all in the world. What one perceives, one expresses, but in a feedback loop, our expressions also influence our perception of the world.
When someone tries to describe the “ultimate reality” through perceptions and language, they are committing an error of metaphysics: trying to go beyond the realm of language while using language. As the religious teacher Anthony de Mello expressed it, “Every word, every image used for God is a distortion more than a description.”Instead, the best that one can do is to recognize that at some point of understanding, the utility of explanation, perception and conceptualization ends, and then one remains silent.
Here lies an important understanding of the apophatic rejection of metaphysics and the rejection of developing theories about what exists and how we know that it exists. Language does not truly represent the world. When one understands the workings of language, one no longer attaches significance to metaphysical theories. For example, according to early Buddhism, the realm of metaphysics is created by seeking “ultimate” correlates for language, which should only be properly understood functionally. Since the teachings of the Buddha are expressed through language and language is based on saññā, neither is meant to represent “ultimate reality.” Instead, the Buddhist view is that liberating insight takes place when thoughts and perceptions cease (even though one’s senses and vedanā, or felt experience, are still functioning normally).
Knowing experience, or the transcendent, has nothing to do with discrimination, analysis, or being separated from it. When saññā and language fall away, one can no longer speak of discernment. Even if one says, “This state is beyond words and cannot be expressed by language; it is timeless, spaceless, God, love, Ultimate, never-ending, etc.,” one is still construing, describing, and misappropriating language. More succinctly, all one can do is remain silent, leaving language, with all its limitations, to merely indicate a way to transcending it, using it as a “raft.”
A useful analogy the Buddha used to describe his teachings was that they are like a raft that carries you to the opposite shore of awakening. The raft is needed to cross the river, but a wise person would not carry the raft around after making it across to the other shore. Use the raft to cross to the other shore but do not become attached to it. You must be able to let it go. Also, all words about transcendent realities are just a raft, hints, or guideposts. Similarly, do not hold onto words as if they are the realities. The Buddha many times stated that his Dhamma or teachings are solely a “raft” that performs the function of reaching the goal of awakening, and apart from that, one remains silent about all else. His teachings describe the practical path leading to the eradication of suffering. In almost all situations, the Buddha limited himself to presenting the path to liberation and to correcting others when they overextended and misused language.
We should remember the helpful analogy from Thich Nath Hahn and the Zen tradition: “A finger pointing at the moon is not the moon. The finger is needed to know where to look for the moon, but if you mistake the finger for the moon itself, you will never know the real moon.” In other words, the moon represents the true transcendent emptiness experience, and the Dhamma, or teachings, are represented by the finger. The Zen master speaks about the Dhamma or teachings as the finger which points to the true transcendent “mind,” and it was his disciple’s mistake to suppose that the true “mind” could be known only by the rational abstraction of the teachings. Instead, words create confusion and there are no words for the deepest experience. While not everything is unsayable in words, the transcendent truth is.
In this chapter, Enlightenment is understanding your true nature. It’s the realization that you are not a separate ego, you are part of the eternal, unbounded energy of the universe. While the Buddha’s teachings describe the clear and practical path leading to the eradication of Dukkha, or dissatisfaction and alienation, in fact, language and conceptual thought are insufficient for achieving awakening and ultimate reality which is beyond the reach of language.As theologian Rudolf Otto said:The holy is ineffable and cannot be fully comprehended or articulated through language. In many early Buddhist texts, there is an acknowledgment of the difficulty of articulating the insights that led to the Buddha’s awakening or characterizing the state of awakening itself because they are beyond the limits of language and conceptuality. In the next chapter, I will demonstrate how awakening is an experience that can be understood through an apophatic interpretation of spirituality.
I recently rediscovered the concept of “flow” that Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi introduced as a psychological concept in 1990 with his book Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. I was struck by its application within positive psychology. Positive psychology focuses on behaviors that foster a flourishing, meaningful, and worthwhile life, aiming to discover methods for personal enhancement. The flow state, also termed “optimal experience,” is characterized by a harmony between mind and body, resulting in complete engagement and enjoyment in the activity. Csikszentmihalyi described this experience as one where,
…the ego falls away. Time flies. Every action, movement, and thought follows inevitably from the previous one, like playing jazz. Your whole being is involved, and you’re using your skills to the utmost.
He identified key characteristics of flow, such as the merging of action and awareness, a loss of self-consciousness, and a distorted sense of time.
Interestingly, there are notable parallels between Csikszentmihalyi’s concept of flow and the Buddhist principle of mindfulness. I have been studying and teaching mindfulness for twenty years due to my interest in Buddhist teachings and their applications to mental health issues. Mindfulness, as defined by Kabat-Zinn (2012), involves wakefulness – a state of awareness in every waking moment – that enhances well-being, contentment, and absorption in the present moment, leading to a similar “losing track of time” as described in Csikszentmihalyi’s flow. It is intriguing to realize that my explorations and teaching of mindfulness included the concept of flow without my fully recognizing their interconnectedness.
There are important similarities between the practices of flow and mindfulness, and this paper will focus on several of these parallels. With mindfulness, we are consciously at one with the action. In the context of mindfulness, wakefulness can best be described as a state of focused awareness in every waking moment (Kabat-Zinn, 2012). Wakefulness enhances our subjective well-being and heightens our contentment with our inner self and the world. Finally, we “lose track of time” as we remain absorbed in the ever-present moment.
An illustration of the application of flow in mindfulness is when we remain in the nonjudgmental “now” and discover the sense of wholeness. Concepts like “in the moment,” “in the present,” and “centered” are all attempts to describe the mindfulness experience. By applying mindfulness to our everyday work, interpersonal interactions, leisure, hobbies, dance, yoga, walking, eating, and other pursuits, we transform our lives into constantly innovative and creative experiences. When completing a task, the mindfulness/flow experience fosters an impromptu, connected, creative, cheerful, and pleasant sensation. We experience an open state, where the interior and exterior are completely interconnected. We lose “ourselves” to discover who we really are.
We can experience oneness in any circumstance throughout our lives. By cultivating the mental culture of mindfulness, we refine the discipline to transcend the experience of duality. We enter a state of openness – of absolute connectedness between the inside and the outside. We surrender our carping, judging thoughts to flow. Our way of thinking typically categorizes everything into strict, binary categories of good and bad, right and wrong, either/or. In my book The Buddha’s Teachings: Seeing Without Illusion, A Contemporary Cognitive Science Perspective (available on Amazon), I describe, in contemporary language, how the Buddha taught this nondualism. Even though the process of thinking is not only acceptable but vital, we tend to make the mistake of assuming that our ideas, classifications, and beliefs are the only true reality or benchmark. An old saying comes to mind: “The mind is a great servant but a terrible master.”
Through the practice of mindfulness and the experience of living in a state of flow, we come to understand that wisdom, compassion, and happiness are attained when we relinquish our subject/object illusion. Life transforms into a less stressful, more creative, and enjoyable experience, allowing us to live a positive existence characterized by respect and care for both ourselves and others. The interconnectedness of life – the intrinsic connection between all living and non-living entities – becomes increasingly apparent, as does the preciousness of life itself. Integrating the flow and mindfulness experiences into our lives can have many positive effects that are just waiting to make a difference for us.
Would it not be prudent for our educational institutions, businesses, and governments to incorporate teachings on flow and mindfulness into their curricula? Such an initiative could positively alter our worldview, culture, and our relationships with both ourselves and one another. I believe that the incorporation of flow and mindfulness into our daily lives could yield countless positive effects that are poised to create meaningful change.
Non-Duality – literally means “not two,” that two things we have understood as separate from one another are in fact not separate at all. At the core of existence, non-duality is a fundamental wholeness that arises from a single, unified source that transcends seeming divisions. Everything is interconnected and inseparable, making dualities—an erroneous perception of difference and separation—illusory. Awakening to non-duality offers profound benefits for personal well-being, fosters harmonious social relationships, and provides a deeper understanding of existence.
1. Unity with All Beings- Everything is interconnected with concurrent, dynamic interactions. Moving beyond superficial perception, we realize our shared essence with all life. Recognizing our deep affinity with life fosters unity, compassion, and empathy toward all living beings.
2. Living in the Present Moment- Non-duality allows us to remain fully present, helping us detach from past regrets and future anxieties. We cultivate inner serenity, empathy and clarity by embracing each moment without judgment or interpretation.
3. Transcendence of Duality. The illusion of duality is the mistaken perception that separates experience into distinct entities. When one realizes the unified nature of existence, this illusion vanishes. Non-dual awareness moves us beyond the limitations of binary thinking and frees us from splitting and rigid categorization, such as mind and body or self and other. These distinctions can lead to suffering; emotional dysregulation, and behavioural issues like aggression, causing psychological pain and instability. Non-dual awareness promotes a broader openness, freeing us from the illusions of separation and their biases.
4. Psychological Well-Being – Non-dual awareness has profound psychological and emotional benefits, for individuals, society and the planet. When we see ourselves as part of a larger whole, the fear of death begins to fade. Instead of viewing death as an end, we can see it as a transformation within the ongoing life cycle making us more psychologically flexible.
5. Embracing the Mystery of Existence – Non-duality invites us to acknowledge the mystery of living and embrace uncertainty. We realize that we cannot know Reality because everything is always changing, and our senses know a fraction of existence. which opens the mystery of living. We aren’t just observers of existence but also an integral part of it. Rather than seeking absolute dominance, we honor and respect the vast reactive complexities that lie beyond our understanding.
6. Non-duality Throughout History. Non-dualism is revealed in universal, ancient, and recent scientific discoveries that all echo similar perspectives which provide an in-depth format for a transpersonal perspective and training. Awakening to Sunyata or “emptiness” is achieved with the help of planned psychological and emotional transformation, that is consistently practiced by motivated students who seek to move from a reactive way of life, in acting, thinking, and feeling, to align themselves with awareness to the universal principles of interconnectedness and impermanence. “The cosmos is within us. We are made of star-stuff. We are a way for the universe to know itself.” – Carl Sagan
A human sees the world in 3 dimensions. That is a simplification. Humans are fundamentally limited, generalizing creatures living on autopilot. Categorization is the brain’s tool to organize nearly everything we encounter in our daily lives. Grouping information into categories simplifies our complex world and helps us to react quickly and effectively to new experiences. Categorization and classification allow humans to organize things, objects, and ideas that exist around them and simplify their understanding of the world. Categorization is like your brain’s very own personal assistant, grouping similar things together so you can find what you need, when you need it.
Our brain categorizes continuously: not only chairs during childhood, but any information at any given age. What advantage does that give us? Pieter Goltstein says: “Our brain is trying to find a way to simplify and organize our world. Without categorization, we would not be able to interact with our environment as efficiently as we do.” In other words: We would have to learn for every new chair we encounter that we can sit on it. Categorizing sensory input is therefore essential for us, but the underlying processes in the brain are largely unknown.
Social categorization is a fundamental human cognitive process because it allows for the quick simplification of complex social information. Scientists at the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology have now shown that also mice categorize surprisingly well. The researchers identified neurons encoding learned categories and thereby demonstrated how abstract information is represented at the neuronal level.
While categorization is a natural and necessary mechanism to cope with the complexity of our world, it perilously inhibits our ability to address the most pressing and tangible problems of our time. The psychological force at play here is a need to categorize — to fit things into neatly defined, clearly labeled boxes. In times of increasing complexity, such categorization can be extremely useful, creating order in a world that is fundamentally messy and establishing structures so that we can better organize, analyze, and manage it. Yet also, extremely limiting in understanding the natural deeper complexity of life.
We are all Interconnected even with the Universe 