Tag Archives: consciousness

Review of “Chapter 14 The Unity of All The God is No-Thing An Apophatic Assertion: An Introduction for Humankind’s Transpersonal Actualization– revised –”

1 May

This is an unsolicited AI review of a chapter from my book cited above that was sent to me in my mailbox. I include it here for your consideration of some interesting points.

Overview

This chapter offers an in-depth exploration of apophatic theology—an approach that emphasizes what cannot be said about the divine—while weaving together both ancient and modern perspectives on mysticism, existential philosophy, and scientific insights. The text positions the apophatic tradition as a valuable, though historically underrepresented, perspective within religious and spiritual discourse. Drawing on references that span neuroscience, quantum physics, and Buddhist teachings, the chapter paints a comprehensive picture of human consciousness as inherently interdependent and open to non-dualistic experience.

Strengths

  1. Interdisciplinary Breadth
    The chapter deftly incorporates insights from neuroscience, psychology, quantum physics, and religious studies. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the convergences of empirical science with apophatic wisdom traditions. By citing modern authors such as Thomas Metzinger, Steven Pinker, and others, the chapter underscores how age-old practices align with contemporary research on consciousness, perception, and cognition.
  2. Clarity in Explaining Apophatic Thought
    Despite the inherently mysterious and paradoxical nature of apophatic spirituality (i.e., knowing God through recognizing the limitations of what can be positively affirmed), the text manages to articulate the main thrust of via negativa in relatively accessible language. Concepts like “I-Thou” relationships, non-duality, and interbeing are introduced in ways that should resonate with readers from various backgrounds.
  3. Use of Concrete Examples and Quotations
    Several key figures—Martin Buber, the Buddha, Jesus, and others—are introduced as exemplars of non-dualistic insight. Quotes from Buber and Buddhist teachings concretize abstract ideas, showing how real people have incorporated “I-Thou” relational practices in daily life. This effectively grounds the sometimes lofty theoretical framework in personal and communal experiences.
  4. Emphasis on Ethical Consequences
    The chapter does not merely focus on the theoretical underpinnings of apophatic spirituality; it also details the moral implications. Themes such as compassion, empathy, and loving-kindness are shown to be organic outgrowths of a more unified awareness. This reaffirms how apophatic insights can have transformative effects on personal conduct and broader social relations.

Points for Consideration

  1. Structuring and Transitional Cues
    While the chapter is rich in content, it sometimes shifts quickly between academic, mystical, and scriptural references. Additional subheadings or transition paragraphs might help ensure a smoother flow, guiding the reader through the various themes such as neuroscience, historical background, apophatic theology, and interpersonal relations.
  2. Integration of Scientific Perspectives
    The chapter draws on a wide range of scientific sources—from neuroscience to quantum theory—to illustrate points about perception and consciousness. Occasional deeper explanation or a clearer bridge between the scientific claims and the apophatic viewpoint would further strengthen the argument. For instance, elaborating on how quantum mechanics influences the concept of non-duality, or how neuroscience specifically supports the idea of “co-creating” reality, could give readers a clearer sense of how the disciplines align.

Notable Contributions

  • Historical Context: The text illuminates how apophatic teachings have often been marginalized in favor of cataphatic approaches, offering a historical perspective on the conflicts that shaped religious traditions.
  • Contemporary Validation: By referencing modern experiments in psychology and linguistics, the chapter gives credibility to the notion that apophatic experiences are not only culturally or historically bound but also supported by scientific frameworks.
  • Comprehensive Reference List: The variety of references—from classical religious texts to works in cognitive science—serves as a useful resource for readers who wish to explore these ideas in greater depth.

Conclusion

Chapter 14 provides a comprehensive and thought-provoking account of how apophatic spirituality, grounded in non-dualistic awareness, transcends traditional theistic frameworks to offer a unifying and compassionate vision of existence. The blend of philosophical argumentation, empirical research, and ethical guidance offers a multi-layered examination of what it means to “know No-Thing.” Overall, the transformative implications for personal and collective well-being are powerfully conveyed, encouraging readers to contemplate and possibly experience directly the non-dual nature of reality.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The Importance of Experiencing Non-Duality

3 Mar

Non-Duality – literally means “not two,” that two things we have understood as separate from one another are in fact not separate at all. At the core of existence, non-duality is a fundamental wholeness that arises from a single, unified source that transcends seeming divisions. Everything is interconnected and inseparable, making dualities—an erroneous perception of difference and separation—illusory. Awakening to non-duality offers profound benefits for personal well-being, fosters harmonious social relationships, and provides a deeper understanding of existence.

       1.      Unity with All Beings- Everything is interconnected with concurrent, dynamic interactions. Moving beyond superficial perception, we realize our shared essence with all life. Recognizing our deep affinity with life fosters unity, compassion, and empathy toward all living beings.

        2.     Living in the Present Moment- Non-duality allows us to remain fully present, helping us detach from past regrets and future anxieties. We cultivate inner serenity, empathy and clarity by embracing each moment without judgment or interpretation.      

        3.     Transcendence of Duality. The illusion of duality is the mistaken perception that separates experience into distinct entities. When one realizes the unified nature of existence, this illusion vanishes. Non-dual awareness moves us beyond the limitations of binary thinking and frees us from splitting and rigid categorization, such as mind and body or self and other. These distinctions can lead to suffering; emotional dysregulation, and behavioural issues like aggression, causing psychological pain and instability. Non-dual awareness promotes a broader openness, freeing us from the illusions of separation and their biases.

        4.     Psychological Well-Being – Non-dual awareness has profound psychological and emotional benefits, for individuals, society and the planet. When we see ourselves as part of a larger whole, the fear of death begins to fade. Instead of viewing death as an end, we can see it as a transformation within the ongoing life cycle making us more psychologically flexible.

       5.      Embracing the Mystery of Existence – Non-duality invites us to acknowledge the mystery of living and embrace uncertainty. We realize that we cannot know Reality because everything is always changing, and our senses know a fraction of existence. which opens the mystery of living. We aren’t just observers of existence but also an integral part of it. Rather than seeking absolute dominance, we honor and respect the vast reactive complexities that lie beyond our understanding.

        6.     Non-duality Throughout History. Non-dualism is revealed in universal, ancient, and recent scientific discoveries that all echo similar perspectives which provide an in-depth format for a transpersonal perspective and training. Awakening to Sunyata or “emptiness” is achieved with the help of planned psychological and emotional transformation, that is consistently practiced by motivated students who seek to move from a reactive way of life, in acting, thinking, and feeling, to align themselves with awareness to the universal principles of interconnectedness and impermanence. “The cosmos is within us. We are made of star-stuff. We are a way for the universe to know itself.” – Carl Sagan

            Rodger R Ricketts

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The Biological Origin of “Self”

14 Feb

“Everything should be as simple as it can be but not simpler!” ~ Albert Einstein

The Biological Origin of “Self”

 In my book, The Buddha’s Teachings: Seeing Without Illusion, I explore the Buddha’s concept of Anatta, or no-self. I show that the Buddha described the concept of self as a relative, linguistic, social construct dependent on culture and time. Experiencing this insight of ‘no-self’ helps us to comprehend and dissolve away the attachment and clinging to self-identification that causes suffering until ultimately all traces of self-identification are gone and all that’s left is freedom.  However, the nature of self is one of the most enduring assumptions of humankind, and if asked how one knows they have a self, often the reply is, “I can make decisions, I can choose; therefore, I know there is an ‘I’ who is the chooser behind my choices.” This blog explores the question, “How real is the conscious self as the cognitive executive in charge?”

 The newest research in neuroscience and biology indicates that besides some significant cognitive embellishments on the original phenomena, selectivity and choice is a function based on an organism’s biological and evolutionary need to minimize and sort out all possible “blooming, buzzing confusion” (William James) that would occur without the body’s filtering system. In his book, Quantum Reality, Physicist Wolfram Schommers quotes physician Hoimar von Ditfurth, who stated: “No doubt, the rule ‘As little outside world as possible, only as much as is absolutely necessary is apparent in evolution. It is valid for all descendants of the primeval cell and therefore for ourselves. Without a doubt, the horizon of the properties of the tangible environment has been extended more and more in the course of time. But in principle, only those qualities of the outside world are accessible to our perception apparatus which, in the meantime, we need as living organisms in our stage of development. Also, our brain has evolved not as an organ to understand the world but an organ to survive.”

 In fact, every second, we are inundated with information from the many stimuli around and in us. In order to keep the brain from becoming overwhelmed by the steady stream of data competing for attention, brain cells work together to sort and prioritize information. Our sense organs and our brain operate as an intricate kind of filter which limits and directs the mind’s focus, so that under normal conditions, attention is concentrated on just those objects or situations or sensations that are of importance to the organism. This ability to pay attention to relevant information while ignoring distractions is a core brain function.

 Without the ability to focus and filter out “noise” we could not effectively function. As reported in Science Digest, in a study appearing in the journal Nature, researchers from Dartmouth’s Geisel School of Medicine and the University of California Davis studied communications between synaptically connected neurons under conditions where subjects shifted their attention toward or away from visual stimuli that activated the recorded neurons. The results point to a novel mechanism by which attention shapes perception by selectively altering presynaptic weights to highlight sensory features among all the noisy sensory input. “While our findings are consistent with other reported changes in neuronal firing rates with attention, they go far beyond such descriptions, revealing never-before tested mechanisms at the synaptic level,” said study co-author Farran Briggs Ph.D., assistant professor of Physiology and Neurobiology at the Geisel School of Medicine. “Many processes in the brain occur automatically and without involvement of our consciousness. This prevents our mind from being overloaded by simple routine tasks. But when it comes to decisions, we tend to assume they are made by our conscious mind. This is questioned by our current findings.” The researchers found that it was possible to predict from brain signals which options participants would take up to seven seconds before they consciously made their decision. The fact that decisions could be predicted so long before they were made goes against our usual intuitive sense that we always make our decisions with conscious deliberation, and that this deliberation process is a foundation of our self.

 How does our brain achieve this ability to choose and focus attention? The answer is believed to be connected with what is called “efficient selection”, which is likened to a filter; routing important sensory information to higher-order perceptual areas of the brain while suppressing disruptions from irrelevant information. Reporting their research in Neuron, Justin Gardner and colleagues at the RIKEN BSI, found that sensory signals were efficiently selected. They said that stimuli that are particularly disruptive to our ability to focus and that evoke high neural activity, are preferentially passed on to perceptual areas of the brain because stimuli with high contrast that evoke large sensory responses, such as flashing lights or loud noises, can easily disrupt our ability to focus. 

  Expanding on the description of the neurobiological- cognitive system in his paper, The self: social construct or neurobiological system?, Philipp Rau wrote:

 ‘We can rightfully reject the social theory of selfhood with its claim that the self is only a social post-lingual emergent. Rather, the self is at root a neurobiological-cognitive system that, long before socialization, allows the individual to be conscious of itself in the world. But having rejected a social account of how the self emerges does not compel us to deny that the self, once emerged, can be shaped by sociocultural factors. The processes contributing to the self are distributed across a number of neuroanatomical structures. It is only their synchronous neural activity that generates a self.  The core self of the neuro-cognitive theory only arises when the organism becomes conscious of itself interacting with the world. Thus, the self emerges precisely when the internal–external boundary is straddled. The phenomenal content of the neuro-cognitive self, however, corresponds to what Cartesian intuition would have us conceive of as an ontologically independent self. There is no such self-independent of the brain and body, of course, but the self-representational processes described by the neuro-cognitive theory, in creating a conscious self-model, produce in us the illusion that there might be (cf. Metzinger, 2003, chs. 1, 6, 8).

 What Descartes in his Meditations believed to have isolated as “a res cogitans” (a thinking thing), is the content of the core self, the product of a neurobiologically driven cognitive system.’

Biochemist Mae-Wan Ho goes one step further by saying that this system is a function not only of the brain, but of how the organism functions as a coherent whole; what she calls “the quantum coherence of the organism”. In an article on the ISIS website titled, Quantum Coherence and Conscious Experience, she wrote, “I propose that quantum coherence is the basis of living organization and can also account for key features of conscious experience – the ‘unity of intentionality, our inner identity of the singular ‘I’, the simultaneous binding and segmentation of features in the perceptive act, the distributed, holographic nature of memory, and the distinctive quality of each experienced occasion.”

In her book, The Rainbow and the Worm, she explains that:

“The liquid crystalline water matrix pervades the entire organism from the extracellular connective tissues to the interior of every single cell and is the carrier of electric and electromagnetic signals. Special membrane proteins have water-filled channels that cross the cell membrane, acting as ‘proton wires’ to transport protons in and out of the cell. This is a special instance of the proton jump conduction that’s much faster than ordinary electric currents through wires, and it could be happening all over the body. The same liquid crystalline matrix transmits the heart’s large pulsating electromagnetic field throughout the body, including the brain, which paces and intercommunicates with the myriad local rhythms. Within the cell, it transmits the much higher frequency electromagnetic waves emitted by molecules that depend on specific frequencies to recognize one another and coordinate their actions even at a distance. So we see that the body is a quantum coherent organism which creates and recreate herself from moment to moment.”

 Mae -Wan Ho likes to call this process “Quantum jazz”, which is the music of the organism dancing life into being. She goes on to write that:

 “Quantum jazz is played out by the whole organism, in every nerve and sinew, every muscle, every single cell, molecule, atom, and elementary particle, a light and sound display that spans seventy octaves in all the colors of the rainbow. There is no conductor or choreographer. Quantum jazz is written while it is being performed; each gesture, each phrase is new, shaped by what has gone before, though not quite. The organism never ceases to experience her environment, taking it in (entangling it) for future reference, modifying her liquid crystalline matrix and neural circuits, recoding and rewriting her genes. Quantum coherence is the ‘I’ in everyone that gives unity to conscious experience.”

 As we can see from these examples of a new understanding about the significance of biological regulation and coherence of the organism, the previously intuitive construct of the “Cartesian Theater” in the brain, wherein the self sits as a spectator on the world and self acts as the CEO executive of all decision making, is exposed as an illusion. Clearly, the biologically based core functions of organization, selectivity, and coherence are necessary for organism survival. The abstracted cognitive embellishments serve as relative, convenient designations or identifications, which constructs a virtual presence of the ‘self’ illusion, and is based in ignorance, and through steadfast identification creates craving and suffering. Only now are we able to empirically support the Buddha’s insights of ‘anatta or no-self’ which he gained through the introspective practice of bhavana, or meditation.

Copyright Rodger R Ricketts, Psy.D. 2021

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Newer Entries →